![]() |
![]() ![]() 1.0 Project Goal and Objectives Goal:
To register 80 NS grade 4 classes in the Ducks Unlimited Canada (DUC) Adopt-a-Class
(AAC) wetland education program by the end of the 2002-03 school year and offer these classes
hands-on wetland field trip opportunities to enhance the learning experience of this wetland
education program. ![]() 2002-2003 School Year
![]() 3.0 Project Results The following tables summarize the registration and participation results of the first two years of the Adopt-a-Class Field Trip program in Nova Scotia. A list of all participating schools along with their sponsors can be found in the accompanying Financial Report. Table 2.0 Nova Scotia Adopt-a-Class 2001-02 Participation Summary
Table 3.0 Nova Scotia Adopt-a-Class 2002-03 Participation Summary
2001-2002 School Year In total 32 classes were registered in the 2001-02 AAC program and received in-class wetland resource kits. Thirty one classes were within a field trip delivery region and were invited on a field trip. Of these, 19 classes were able to attend a field trip, representing a 61% field trip attendance rate. 2002-2003 School Year In total 65 classes were registered in the AAC program and received in-class wetland resource kits. Fifty of these classes were located in field trip delivery sites and were invited on a wetland field trip. Of these, 45 classes were able to attend a field trip in spring 2003, representing a 90% field trip attendance rate, an increase of almost 30% over the 2001-02 school year. 4.0 Project Assessment 2001-2002 School YearField trip feedback forms were issued to all class teachers who attended a field trip in the 2001-02 program (n=19). We received completed feedback forms from only 4 teachers (21% return rate). The feedback results did indicated a high level of teacher and student satisfaction in the program. 100% of the teachers who responded gave the overall program a rating of good to excellent. However, we must be cautious in rating the entire program based on this feedback due to the low return rate on the feedback forms. Teacher feedback, combined with personal insight and consultation with staff and volunteers involved in this pilot study resulted in the following project assessment
2002-2003 School Year Field trip feedback forms were issued to all class teachers who attended a field trip in the 2002-03 program (n=45). We received completed feedback forms from 12 teachers (27% return rate). The feedback results once again indicated a high level of teacher and student satisfaction in the program. 100% of the teachers who responded gave the overall program a rating of good to excellent. Overall, the program ran much more smoothly due to the experience acquired in the first pilot year. Using educational partnerships to help us deliver the program enabled us to provide a more localized field trip site and to run field trips simultaneously in different regions of the province. Considering that May and June offer such a small window of opportunity to engage classes in outdoors field trip programming, the ability to offer field trips simultaneously at multiple sites around the province will enable us to expand the program and engage a larger number of youth in wetland education. Having the registration process centralized from our DUC office in Fredericton enabled us to better manage and track the sponsorship funds as they came in and more promptly match these funds with schools. This improved efficiency enabled us to increase our sponsorship funds and final registration numbers this year. Teacher feedback, combined with personal insight and consultation with staff and volunteers involved in the 2002-03 program resulted in the following recommendations for next year:
![]() Schools who were involved in the AAC program in the 2002-03 school year will be the first schools registered in the 2003-04 school year. As teachers become more familiar with the material in the resource kit and recognize the educational value of the field trip to compliment in-class activities, they will become more effective at communicating wetland messages to their class. As such, we want to ensure that we maintain our current classes in the program and sign up new classes as funding allows. In this way, students will anticipate this exciting program as they move through the grade levels, having heard about the "wetland field trip" from the kids who have already experienced it. By re-registering past schools first, we ensure that both student and teacher enthusiasm for the program is not lost. Sponsors were all provided with a thank you letter from Ducks Unlimited that highlighted how many schools, classes and teachers that the AAC program impacted in the most recent school year. They were asked, at this time, if they would be interested in re-sponsoring their class(es) for the following school year. In this way we follow up each sponsorship with a yearly update and encourage their continued support for the next year. This process builds a stronger sponsor-class relationship. 6.0 Financial The 2001-02 AAC Field Trip program's final cost was $29,337.98 from a budgeted $25,585.00. The 2002-03 AAC Field Trip program's cost was $44,601.36 from a budgeted $36,655.00. Activity Descriptions 1) Bird Watching This activity introduces students to the various types of birds living in a wetland. Students are given a brief introduction to some common wetland birds, the differences between male and female ducks and between divers and dabblers. Finally, before the students receive binoculars, they are introduced to the basics of binocular use. Students then spend the remainder of the time searching and identifying various types of birds and counting the total number of species they have observed. A scope is available for students to get a closer look at interesting birds. 1) Critter DippingThe critter dipping activity is designed to introduce students to the diversity of invertebrates living beneath the waters of a wetland. Concepts of invertebrates and microhabitat are discussed with the students and proper sampling techniques are demonstrated prior to the activity. Students then dip for "critters" using nets and buckets in various microhabitats found in the wetland. Samples are then collected in "port-a-ponds" for the rest of the class to observe. Afterwards, the group discusses what was found and each student is given the opportunity to take a closer look at the critters while the DUC interpreter discusses wetland adaptions that these creatures have. As a conclusion, the importance of invertebrates in wetland food chains is reinforced. 3) Migration HeadacheThis game is designed to introduce students to the many challenges that migratory birds face and effects of habitat loss and creation. The session begins with a brief discussion on habitat, and how it can be created and destroyed. Carpet pieces which represent wetland habitat, are laid at both ends of the playing field. One end of the field represents a duck's winter habitat, while the other represents summer habitat. Throughout the game, students migrate back and forth between their winter and summer habitats. Several factors that affect migration are introduced each season, and a subsequent number of habitats are either taken away or added. Ducks unable to find habitat are "dead ducks" and must stand on the side. When habitat is restored, "dead ducks" can re-enter the game as new ducklings. Some of the factors introduced include oil spills, housing projects, highway development, golf course creation, wildlife refuges, forest fires, and Ducks Unlimited projects. At the end of the game, participants gather around a white board, where they graph the changes in the waterfowl population over time. Students then engage in a discussion about some of the ways humans can alleviate some of these impacts. The students walk away with a very real perception of the difficulties associated with migration, and some of the ways humans can help. 4) Mystery Touch BoxesIn this activity, students get to explore their five senses to better understand and appreciate wetlands. Students are asked what they can smell, taste, touch, hear, and see in a wetland. Five "mystery boxes" are placed on the ground, each containing a real wetland item that students will feel to guess the identify. Students are divided into five equal groups, with each group starting at a different box. Each group gets a few minutes to touch what is inside the box and guess what it is. Groups then rotate until each group has touched each memory box item. Participants are not allowed to look inside the box. At the end of the activity, the boxes are opened and the group leader discusses why each item is important to a wetland. Items include: beaver pelt, cattail flower, duck wing, deer antler, algae, etc. 5) Wetland ValuesWetland Values is a game of association that teaches the students about ten environmental values that wetlands offer. The group discusses the definition of a wetland and then proceeds to talk about the different types of wetlands found in Atlantic Canada using wetland display boards. The group is divided into three equal teams. Ten items are then distributed amongst each of the three groups. Each item represents a value offered by wetlands to wildlife and/or humans (eg. a sponge represents how wetlands absorb and holds water to prevent flooding). The station leader then reads out a series of wetland value cards. The student holding the item corresponding to the value called has to run down the field and place th item in a "wetland box" and return to their team. The first on back gains a point for their team. The game is then played in reverse with the students picking up the correct item when a value card is read to reinforce the ten wetland values. To conclude, the group reviews the ten values with the DU interpreter. Colleen Martin | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||