|
April 25 - May 4, 1998
Submitted by: Linda D. MacDonald, May 15, 1998
Observations:
A. The groundwork and planning by Mr. Bill Radford, Director,
International Centre, prior to the trip, was more
than adequate. Prior arrangements for translation,
travel, hotels and US dollars were much appreciated.
Translation for presentations and technical discussions
was a necessity. Many establishments had problems
with VISA and ready cash was also a necessity. Exchange
of US dollars to Krooni (1:12) was the easiest currency
exchange route. Bottled water and a watchful eye on
diet was also a necessity.
B. Overall, the presentations went well.
The Estonian Ministry of Agriculture was in turmoil
as they were moving into newly refurbished quarters.
This, coupled with the vacation of Olav Kreen for
the entire week, made the initial presentation a little
awkward. The officials present appeared at first not
to know why we were there, and one individual was
overtly hostile.
However, as a group, they were soon won over. There
was keen interest in the Department's "hands-on" extension
philosophy and marketing programming, with many questions
on market information and research. (Much of the Estonian
Ministry's resources are tied to policy and strategy
in an effort to align with EU requirements.)
Presentations at the University of Tartu were well
attended. Approximately 20 attended for the marketing
presentation on day one, and approximately 30 for
production aspects. The main interest by staff, students
and producers was overwhelmingly in the production
aspects of wild blueberries. Issues of varieties,
production technology (fertilizer, weed and pest control,
climatic effects) and management costs formed the
bulk of the queries offered by those in attendance.
C. Much investment in human and financial resources
will be necessary to "build" a wild blueberry industry
in Estonia.
Initial opportunities are present for a fresh market'
crop for domestic and export consumption, providing
post-harvest handling conditions are met.
An entrepreneurial "spirit" is present, the opportunities
are real, but much training and organizing of producers
will be necessary (i.e. farm management, business
training, technology transfer - e.g. production technology,
post-harvest handling).
Processing is not currently an option - the plant
(Saarek) is old and inefficient. Without investment,
the plant will unlikely be able to compete long-term
with EU competitors.
Please contact the Marketing and Food Industry
Development Branch for a full copy of this report.
|